Interview: Salome Zurabishvili, President of Georgia
Georgian President Salome Zurabishvili sat down with VOA’s Ia Meurmishvili for a wide-ranging interview about Georgia’s prospects for EU and NATO membership, Russia’s military occupation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and Georgia’s efforts to find its place in the ‘new European renaissance.’
Madam President, thank you very much for finding the time to talk to us today. In the beginning of March, President Macron published an op-ed in which he presented his view of “European renaissance.” Not too long ago you also talked about it and you said Georgia needs to find its place in “New European Renaissance.” How do you see that?
As it was the case in many previous years, the European Union progresses through different crises. This is one of the crises of the European Union, which probably will give birth to a new form of the European Union. What’s important for Georgia is not to lose its perspective, which is integration into the European Union whatever form it might take in the future. If in this process the European Union takes different formats we have to be ready for these formats too. That is what we are doing now. We will have an important conference in Batumi during the summer for the 10th anniversary of partnership where we will set out our views of where we can be – already today – members of the EU programs. The short way to describe it would be to get into the European Union everywhere where we can today before getting in the whole [of Europe], piece by piece…
And what exactly is that? How do you see Georgia doing that? It is not just Georgia’s desire to join the European structures including the EU and NATO, but it is also the political will from the European side. At the moment, Europe seems to be in disarray with Brexit, populism, and other challenges.
These crises could be a place for rethinking certain things. What the European Union is not clear about is enlargement as a whole, but it is already clear that Georgia is being accepted in different formats whether it is Erasmus and we can go further in education, or culture and we can go all the way to that end too. It is also true about transport, and about the fact that we are sharing the free and comprehensive trade with the European Union. We could go much further into security and defense with the European Union. We are present in Mali and Central Africa. With NATO, we have shown that we can be very good partners in Afghanistan and that we are ready to be sharing this security and defense contribution. So, these are all different ways to access the European Union while it is not yet ready to make the final, I would say, political decision. But we have to feel this period with movement, with rapprochement and be closer because that is what keeps our population seeing a perspective towards Europe.
Is America still the number one strategic partner for Georgia?
Who else?
How do you see deepening of that partnership with the United States? Georgia has the Strategic Charter with the United States and over the years that charter has fulfilled its mission. Do you anticipate to deepen the relationship with the United States based on the Strategic Charter?
I think we are already seeing it through the increased number of American navy vessels coming to the Black Sea. The Black Sea is becoming much more important in the strategic view of the United States. In the Black Sea, there are NATO partners on the other shore – Romania and Bulgaria – but we are the strategic partner are on this side and are ready to see the Black Sea being a more important link with the United States. That is one of the ways of deepening this strategic partnership. And of course a direct military relationship for Georgia, its continued partnership with the United States and with NATO is the way to make the country more ready in terms of defense and I think Georgia has been doing quite a lot and has been recognized as a very reliable partner.
Do you have a wish list? What would you like the United States to do for Georgia?
I think what we have to see is increased military cooperation because there is never enough [of it]. Since our military forces are ready to do more they can still benefit from additional direct cooperation and not only through NATO. We have to do much more on cybersecurity and this could go through NATO or directly. That’s a new threat and Georgia is located in a [difficult] region. It is difficult to tackle the problem with one’s national base [only]. So, there we need a lot of new forms of cooperation.
Would you be open to the idea of having an American military base in Georgia?
I do not think that it would be recommended. I think that this country – located where it is – needs to reinforce security. We do not need to take steps that might be viewed as provocations and I do not think that the United States would be ready for having here a military base that would probably attract reactions both from Russia and from terrorist movements that are very active in the region. I think that – based on mutual understanding – we need to go the way of reinforcing and adding to the military cooperation, but not taking steps that might provoke other reactions.
Russia occupies 20% of Georgia. How do you see the relations with Russia at this point? Are you open to a dialogue with Russia? Because you have talked about the Geneva format and you have talked about increasing the weight of the format. How do you see it and what is your position vis a vis Russia?
Well, in general, in theory, when a country like Georgia has said that it would not revert to any form of military force or use military force to solve the problem of the occupied territories, it is clear that there is only one instrument left and that is diplomacy. When you do not use military, there is no other known instrument at this stage. We do not have diplomatic relations with Russia and we cannot have diplomatic relations with Russia as long as Russia does not show that it is ready to deal with us in a different manner than force.
At this stage we are completely relying on our partners to be our champions with Russia in their own bilateral talks to remind, to ask and to demand from Russia to respect its commitments. Of course, we understand that it will not change the situation in the occupied territories today, but there might come a day and I hope it will be soon, where that might have some effect. So we cannot let either Russia or our partners forget that the issue of the occupied territories is a very central issue for Georgia.
What is important and I want to underline that despite the occupied territories and despite everyday pressures with hostage taking, with humanitarian pressure on the populations on both sides of the occupying line, this has not been a victory for Russia because Georgia has kept its line and its perspective to join the EU and NATO. I think that was the ultimate aim of Russia to affect Georgia’s determination – so it is a victory for Georgia and it is not for Russia.
Do you feel from your partners that Russia does not have a veto over Georgia’s integration into NATO and the EU?
Russia does not have a veto and will never have a veto.
Partner PostThis material was prepared for Civil.ge by the Voice of America. In order to license this and other content free of charge, please contact Adam Gartner.
